A GitHub Releases alternative for customer-facing release notes
If your audience is engineers who live in GitHub, GitHub Releases is fine. Most SaaS customers want product updates in plain language, on a page that doesn't look like a commit log. That's where you need something else.
When GitHub Releases is still the right choice
If your users are mostly engineers, already follow your repo, and read tagged releases natively, GitHub Releases is a perfectly good default. Don't add a tool just to add a tool. Use it until it stops fitting.
Where GitHub Releases stops working for SaaS
The moment your audience includes non-developers (designers, marketers, founders, customer success teams, end users), GitHub Releases starts to feel like the wrong room. Internal tags, commit SHAs, and dependency bumps make sense to engineers and confuse everyone else.
GitHub Releases vs Paperstick at a glance
| Area | GitHub Releases | Paperstick |
|---|---|---|
| Best audience | Developer-native users who live in the repo | Mixed SaaS audiences, including non-developers |
| Publishing workflow | Repo- and tag-first | Customer-facing release notes first |
| Reader experience | Technical release log | Clean page, RSS feed, filters by type, permalinks per entry |
| Multiple products | Split across repos and conventions | Multiple changelogs per account, each with its own URL |
| Team pricing | Not designed as a changelog product | Flat $30/month for the whole team, no per-seat math |
How to move from GitHub-only updates
Don't rip anything out. Keep tagging releases in GitHub for your engineers and integrators. Add a customer-facing changelog on whatsnew.app for everyone else, link to it from your app and docs, and stop trying to make a commit log do two jobs.
Need a customer-facing alternative?
Start free for 30 days. Publish your first customer-facing changelog in minutes.